Saturday, December 15, 2012

The Real Super-Matrix?

While I usually only speak of my opinions on matters of perception and the interpretation of what can be deemed as consensus truths, this article has probably got to be THE all-encompassing and condensed QUESTION to seek an answer to: Do we live in a Matrix?


A silly notion to ponder on really, since it is practically a challenge to reality itself. Can an occupant of a closed system fully prove to himself (and also other occupants, more later on this issue) that his reality and all the physical rules and constraints by which his very existence is subjected to is encompassed in a rigged system? Why even posit an assumption? Does it emanate from a need to achieve "true freedom" (as what had been the contentious issue in the Matrix Trilogy)? What is true freedom, anyway? If it's simply a "Matrix" manipulated by a sentient being who is a "non-God", but had somehow managed to enslave and deceive humanity (I'm assuming this is the line of thinking if we're basing the theory from the Movie), what is true freedom from this supposed "manipulator" (who should not be mistaken for the TRUE Higher Being who bestows absolute free will [theologically, i.e. God])? Was this system designed to limit sentient life from becoming god-like in status? How can it be possible that we can all be gods, if from the semantics alone a god should possess exclusivity in its dominion over everything else (there can only be one!)? For the sake of scientific inquiry, I'm ignoring the fact that there is a paradox to the underlying purpose of this theory. If there is a truth that can be uncovered, then by all means the theorists should be given all the rights and faculties to find it; but at the end of that tunnel, is there any true comfort to really finding out or are we simply driven by the human compulsion to find whatever answer there is out there to a given question?

As Cypher had put it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Z7BuQFUhsRM
Ignorance is bliss

While we are on the subject matter, I recommend that people support this unofficial Matrix 4 screenplay, which is about a Supermatrix, a matrix outside the matrix, which is a "reverse Inception" type of mechanism in my opinion. I'm still hoping that I get to see a new Matrix Trilogy before I die:


Moving on, I also mentioned that all occupants must also be convinced with this proof, otherwise, the person who supposedly found the answer would be deemed a crazy occupant who perceives things outside of what is sensible to what the "system" is portraying or projecting to everyone else. That person will probably be committed to an asylum for "not making any sense", so whatever proofs or calculations that cannot merely be comprehended by simple empirical facts and sensory input are beyond those who are unable to keep up with the pace of reasoning that theorists may posit. In other words, if you're a smarty pants, that can only explain things to yourself, while no one else can understand you, then you are so going to burn on the stake.

I've blogged about perceptions and control before, albeit limited to the secular level:


And so, with this theory, it is insinuated that "A System" was built on which humanity is a captive of. In any scale of whatever system, however, exists the question to the purpose by which these were created or discovered/defined (in the case of naturally occurring ones). Should people be looking at the ends or the means of which these systems had been deemed to exist in humanity's perception and people's minds? I think an interesting perspective can be read from one of my previous blog entries (that I just recently gave a title to):


In exploring these ideas, I've come to the conclusion that the Middle Way and to be a moderate is truly the most ideal path to take:


There are probably questions that are beyond humanity's capabilities to answer. From an anthropocentric perspective, it seems man's destiny is to evolve into something greater. For this belief, I do not know if it is simple rhetoric or if there is a literal view that men can become gods, but the answer to this is probably not for anyone at this point to witness. For the billions of years that the Universe has existed, any one human being can only last for a speck's time, a blip in the time stream that no higher sentient being would ever notice at all. So when did you last get the "sad" news that drone ant #529,432,012,454 died when an aardvark decided it was lunch time? In my belief, we can only find meaning from within for ourselves and expectations of fame and glory should be put aside if we consider how trivial our lifetime is when laid over Eternity's length.


*Image from http://images.wikia.com/anythingeverything/images/5/5c/The_Matrix.gif


All compositions, statements and opinions of the author are copyright © Earl T. Malvar 2009-2012. All rights reserved. There is no honor, respect, admiration, intellectual and academic dignity garnered through plagiarism.

Monday, December 10, 2012

Pacquiao vs Marquez 4, Pacman's Loss and the Blame Game

So boxing fans all over recently witnessed how Manny Pacquiao ate Juan Manuel Marquez's knuckle sandwich and subsequently ate the ring mat for desert. I have nothing, but respect for these guys and they've had excellent boxing careers for themselves, respectively. While, it's disappointing that Pacquiao didn't win, Marquez won this fair and square...convincingly I should add. Marquez definitely earned this, I mean at some point drinking your own pee has to pay-off, right?! It's satisfying to see how obnoxiously smug Filipinos posting online comments on Yahoo and other sites are now eating humble pie. It was also pretty awesome to witness how gracious Manny Pacquiao was in defeat.


“First and foremost I would like to thank God for keeping Juan Manuel Márquez and me safe during our fight on Saturday night,” said Pacquiao.

“I want to congratulate Juan Manuel. I have no excuses. It was a good fight and he deserved the victory. I think boxing fans who watched us were winners too."


"He got me good. That's boxing," Pacquiao who admitted he got over confident when he also knocked down Marquez on the fifth. "Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose."


While I am no boxing analyst or even a fan at that, I always thought that Marquez had Pacquiao's number. I've seen alot of Pacman fights (not the video game one) and he has always been the aggressor, always attacking (nonstop) and the Marquez matches always seemed like he (Pacman) had to pay somewhat for being overly committed to attacking. As a counter-puncher, Marquez knew how to punish Pacquiao's style and I don't think Pacquiao ever truly figured out how to beat Marquez, because despite multiple knockdowns in the past (and even in the recent match), Marquez is one tough S.O.B. who can't seem to get knocked out.

Interestingly, days earlier, Pacman had been saying what the game plan was and it was for him to be the aggressor (again), unlike the previous fight wherein he was "boxing" against Marquez and not "pitbully-ing" his way through.

I have to agree that it was a lucky punch with the round ending, but it was one wicked lucky punch. The pace was great and Manny was chipping away on Marquez's defense:

*********************************************************************
Must Read:


*********************************************************************



Anyway, what prompted me to give my insights on the results of the match was actually because of the angry comments of Manny Pacquiao's mom on national television, who was raving mad about how it was because of Manny's choice to leave the Catholic Church and pick another Christian institution, that brought upon his loss in such a shocking fashion.

Now, this doesn't make sense at all in my view, but if his decision had somehow psychologically influenced his neural pathways, which affected his kinesiology, then I might give credence to the belief that the loss had something to do with his choice of following a new religious institution. In other words, he was DISTRACTED and PREOCCUPIED (which for any craft or skill, means there's a lack in focus). In my adamant opinion, this is a poor argument because this is precisely what perpetuates the divisive (and sometimes hateful) tendencies of humanity, that are brought on by religions all over the world (more so for the zealous, faith-obsessed, and would-be "martyrs" of their faith). Not only does it sound absurd and silly, but it seems beyond logic, not unless it has become a mental distraction for Pacquiao and is probably applicable to his decision to become a public servant in the Philippines, as well.

At the very least, he wasn't physically debilitated by the knockout punch (yet).



All compositions, statements and opinions of the author are copyright © Earl T. Malvar 2009-2012. All rights reserved. There is no honor, respect, admiration, intellectual and academic dignity garnered through plagiarism.